|
|
MAKOS,
KRISTOF, AND BIKE WEEK
|
||||||
| HOME | LET'S
TALK |
SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE
TO WEEKLY EZINES |
||||
|
|
Makos, Kristof,
and Bike Week
Gerald A. Honigman
I guess this piece had to be written.
Not
that I'm superstitious or anything. But what I am about to tell you
would have had to have been one heck of a coincidence. I hope I do it
justice.
We were driving in the miserable Daytona Beach traffic during "Bike
Week," when scores-- if not hundreds--of thousands of Harleys converge
on our beachside community from all over the United States and
elsewhere.
We had just dropped our youngest off at the movies with her friends and
were heading out to meet one of our other kids at her new job.
We
stopped to pick her up a sandwich, and while my wife went in to the
shop, I decided to read the day's paper. Big mistake.... There's no
rest for the weary...at least those of us who care.
There was Nicholas Kristof's op-ed piece, "A Question Of Double
Standards," staring at me while I was supposedly taking a break.
Now
I know a bit about double standards myself-- real ones, not
Kristof's figments.
One
of my own articles on the subject has made it into dozens of
publications under a few different titles, as major op-ed pieces in
newspapers, in Nobel Laureate-sponsored academic journals on reference
lists of leading universities around the world, etc. So I think I'm
somewhat qualified to respond.
Why
is it, for example, that journalists like Nicholas Kristof, Thomas
Friedman, David Ignatius, Richard Cohen, and others are
obsessed with the creation of a 23rd Arab state--a
second Arab one within the original borders of the
Palestinian Mandate as Britain received it on April 25, 1920 before
Colonial Secretary Churchill chopped off 80% in 1922 and awarded
it to Arab allies in the creation of Transjordan, but are deaf, dumb,
and blind (or worse) regarding the plight of some thirty million stateless
Kurds?
In
the September 16, 2003 Washington Post, Ignatius could only
address Kurds as terrorists or rebels--while never dreaming of
using the "T" word for Arab disembowelers of Jewish babes and grandmas.
In
Thomas Friedman's earlier March 26th article in the New York
Times, he advised that the Kurds should be told point
blank, "what part of 'no' don't you understand? ...You Kurds are
not breaking away." And the media's sickening hypocrisy is
mirrored by the crew that has hijacked Middle Eastern Studies on
far too many campuses and too often in our own Government as
well...especially at Foggy Bottom.
But
I've digressed. Back to Bike Week...
We
resumed our drive in bumper to bumper traffic, and I got thinking about
the Kristof travesty. He simply bought right into the standard Arab
propaganda lines...Jews taking "Arab" lands, Israel giving poor Arabs
"no alternatives," etc.
I
haven't been doing enough fishing lately and hardly ever get my
late Dad's little boat out anymore. Still, I was considering how
great it would be if, by simply saying over and over again that the
25-foot Mako sport fishing boat of my daydreams was mine, I
could make it so. The Arabs have done this and many buy into their lies.
Now
you're not going to believe what happened next.
I
turned off the main road and up a side street to try to escape some of
the traffic. Guess what was sitting there, a little ways up the
road?... My 25 footer....!!!!!!!!
So,
I had to write this. Understand?
Back to Kristof...
Don't get me wrong, for his stripe of journalist, this piece was
actually an attempt at some kind of fair play. He actually brought up
the "Hama Solution"--where Syrian Arabs slaughtered more than ten times
the number of their own "problems" in less than a month than died
in over two years fighting Israel in an intifada that Arabs
themselves started after rejecting an offer of a 23rd state
on over 97% of the disputed territories with a capital in
Jerusalem. Ambassador Dennis Ross was present at the Camp David
2000 and Taba negotiations and spelled out that the offer was for
a contiguous state, not disconnected "cantons" as Arafat's
spin doctors claim, and that over $30 billion dollars was offered as
well to seal the deal.
What was that line by Kristof in today's rant about Arabs not being
offered any alternatives? The reality that the Kristof Krew refuses
to deal with is that nothing short of Israel's consent to suicide will
be enough for the Arafat/ Hamas good cop/ bad cop team. They've been
caught repeatedly admitting this, calling the Oslo peace process fiasco
where the more Israel gave, the more it bled, a "Trojan Horse."
And this by so-called "moderate " Arab spokesmen.
Whatever fairness Kristof attempted in his latest op-ed was completely
shattered by his closing punch line about Israel's security fence on
"Palestinian" land.
So,
for Nick's sake, I'll try again. Here goes...
Just who is a "settler" in the Middle East?
Of
course, Arabs and their mouthpieces point to Jews. And the
latter "illegally stole purely Arab land." Kristof made a
variation of this same claim in today's article.
So,
unless the "West Bank" is ethnically cleansed of the Jewish presence,
as the fiction goes, and those like Kristof buy into, there will be no
chance for peace.
Israel's fence, if tolerated at all, must therefore cling to the
Auschwitz/armistice lines of 1949 which made it, among other things, a
mere 9-miles wide at its vulnerable waist. The press constantly
supports this position. Countless editorials and columns have appeared
spouting such wisdom.
During the Mandatory period following the break up of empires after
World War I, the League of Nations Permanent Mandates Commission
recorded scores of thousands of Arabs pouring into a largely
depopulated Palestine from surrounding countries to take advantage of
the economic development going on because of the Jews. Many more
entered under cover of darkness and were never listed. All of these
folks were preceded in the 19th century by many thousands of Egyptians
who came with Muhammad Ali's invading armies and never left... more
Arab settlers in Palestine setting up Arab settlements.
Arafat himself was one of them, coming from Cairo, Egypt. So was Hamas'
"patron saint," Izzadin al-Qassam... coming from Aleppo, Syria. These
folks later became known as "native Palestinians."
While this is not to say that there were not native Arabs also living in Palestine, it is to say that many if not most of these folks were also newcomers - settlers - themselves.
Again...many of the villages set up in the West Bank and elsewhere were
settlements established by Arab settlers. And there were Jews whose
families never left Israel/Judaea/Palestine as well over the centuries,
despite the tragedies of the Roman Wars, forced conversions of the
Byzantines, the Diaspora, Crusades, etc.
In the wake of the '67 War started by Egypt's Nasser's blockade of Israel at the Straits of Tiran and other hostile acts (a casus belli), UN Resolution #242 did not demand that Israel return to the suicidal armistice lines of 1949. It called, instead, for the creation of "secure and recognized" borders to replace those lines.
Furthermore, those lands where much of the compromising would have to
be done after Israel already withdrew from the Sinai--i.e. Judea and
Samaria/the "West Bank"--were not "Arab" lands as Kristof claims but unapportioned
territories of the Mandate, open to settlement by both Jews
and Arabs. Leading international legal scholars such as Eugene Rostow,
William O'Brien, and others have written extensively about this. The
current demand that those lands, where Jews (Judea...Judeans...Jews)
have thousands of years of connecting history, now become Judenrein--is
thus totally unwarranted.
The
route of the security fence that Arafat and Hamas constructed must also
take all of this into consideration.
There must be a reasonable compromise regarding those disputed
territories--not a unilateral withdrawal forced upon the Jews by the
ignorant, anti-Semites, and 21st century Chamberlains in the pockets of
Arab oil sheikhs.
|
||||||